mental influence to an animal???, coincidence or not? Options

Hello all...
Well I want to know if the following can be true.. The facts are as follows:

1) i did a bet on a horse in a race
2) in that race the hot favourite looked in superb condition and keen to gallop...
This caused me to be anxious coz i was afraid that the favourite has a great chance of winning..
3) i somewhat wanted the favourite to lose.. i have never done any occult or similar thing like that before... When the horse was running the race, I imagined the heart of the horse and i like of imagined my hand pressing against the heart of the horse... like to stop it from running that fast .... Eventually the favourite won the race and i got angry... coz i lost money.. Normally races are fixed and you just get angry on the way the jockeys make a fool of the betting public...
4)well waht happened later frightened me.. the horse was in superb condition before the race but sohrtly after the race, theere was an announcement stating that the horse had died of a heart failure shortly after it won the race...
I was sad and really wished it was coincidence of what happened..
Can someone enlighten me if such thing is possible or not that it could have been due to someone doing such things in imagination and this comes true??

Dont get angry... i wantd to know if this was just an overlapping of 2 events that made me feel one is the cause of the other...

what i want to know is that can something like that be achieved? to control by the mind without any prior practice etc? 

I am not angry but your posts are contradictory in nature. Look at the definition of coincedence from Webster's Dictionary. (I will quote verbatim)

Coincidence--an accidental and remarkable occurrence of events, ideas, etc. at the same time, suggesting but lacking a causal relationship.

Yet after my statement that it may be only coincidence you state that "coincidence does not exist to you". Then you wonder if it may be coincidence although you use the definition rather than using the word.

People can do things without training or without intent. All people perform magickal acts throughout the day, we study magick so that we may have control over these events.

Sporadic acts of magick can be helpful in the situation but they lack reliability.

I only made the statement that you killed the horse because you denied coincidence leaving the option that you had caused the heart attack. If you have two choices for how the situation unfolded and you deny one then you are left with the other.

If you wish to ascribe the situation to overlapping events then you can no longer deny coincidence. This was the point I was trying to make.

This post has been edited by chaoscrowley37: Dec 16 2005, 03:40 PM