QUOTE
So, could we say that we want to explore the relativity (or difference or connection) between pairs of thoughts or things or states that mind interprets as opposite and are not described by scientific definitions in such a way that the use of the mental description carried no information that could not be expressed without it?
For example, what is hot or cold depends on my perception at the moment, but what is black or white is defined very specifically by science and one could substitute these last terms by their scientific definitions and say exactly the same thing.
Yes, thats where i want to go exactly.
As far as the defenition of the mind goes. As long as we can limit what the the mind does it is good enough. Just how it does this is not so important for our discussion, and it would lead us, as you say, of topic.
Your defenition is better suited for this discussion than mine, i sometimes get to magical in these things, wich leaves to many options open for a decent discussion.
I am willing to go then with this defenition.
The mind is a non-physical phenomenon, partly identified with, and partly distinguished from the soul that is manifested in thought, perception, self-consciousness, emotion, will, memory, imagination and reaction to the environment.