QUOTE(MasterVerro @ Jun 4 2006, 01:23 PM)
Melez, Vagrant Dreamer.
It seems you have been reading just a bit too much Carlos Castaneda.
The teachings of Don Juan and Carlos Castenada should be taken lightly as an approach to ACTUAL sorcery.
The only reason what Don Juan did was ever referred to as SORCERY was the fact that is what he was referred to in Mexico. His teachings are much more that of a seer or shaman than a sorceror.
As for your use of the word twliight, that in no way has anything to do with sorcery, or the teaching of Don Juan. The term is one made up by the writers of The Library of Knowledge.
Ho Drakon Ho Megas!
Master Verro
The similarity in lexicon should not imply a direct developement of technique from Carlos Casteneda's book - if you have read them, then you will know that within them are listed several techniques for developing Sight, and I have mentioned none of them.
I reference Castaneda briefly only because wether he was a fiction writer or anthropologist, he accurately portrayed some aspects of the energetic universe.
I mentioned the term twilight only as a locally familiar reference to a state of mind in which one is able to percieve the energetic reality.
Also, while I have offered before my own interpretation of what the words "Sorcerer" implies, it is an implication only, and I believe most would agree that to 'define' sorcery into a particular brand or tradition of magickal practice would be foolish - Sorcerer is a synonym for Wizard, Magician, etc. - at one point in history a synonym with Alchemist as well. I have already defined these terms for their specific application here, so there is no point mincing words over words.
There's no question as to wether or not these techniques bear fruit.
If your dissection is one that comes from practical, life experience with magick, then by all means, offer your rebuttle of what I have to say - in magickal practice, refuting sources is foolish. We may define magick as a whole as the practice of applying one's intention to the universe in order to bring about change. As you can imagine, this is a broad definition, and the only functioning concepts within it are Intention, Universe, and Change, with no reference to the means by which that change is brought about.
I simply submit that by having a basic intellectual grasp of the fundamentals of energetic meta-physics, the student may develope a more accurate ability to properly, objectively, percieve and evaluate the mystical significance of his life experience.
It is subjectivity of mystical senses which often blinds the student. There is a vastly popular belief that there is only a subjective reality. This belief is considered empowering to much of today's mystical youth, but time and again it proves to be a barrier towards the higher levels of spiritual - magickal - growth. Most young magicians - and I'll warrant most here are - are more concerned with results than with Perception and Knowledge -
How do I make things happen, what
tradition or
word do I use to do this or that. But, these things become obvious when proper perception and objectivity of the energetic universe is acquired. You may call consistent subjectivity the same as "Letting Self get in the way." Subjectivity is for Navigating and creating experience, objectivity is for sensing and evaluating.
The best way to express the fundamentals is by making references and analogies to things which parallell them. This can be anything from daily occurences, to the movements of the planets, to Carlos Castaneda.
As I said: all that IS, IS, and all that IS NOT, IS NOT. Everything represents something, even if it doesn't seem true - if it is, then it is true, period. If it wasn't, it wouldn't be there. The trick is understanding what Truth is being represented and how.
peace