QUOTE(Acid09 @ Jul 17 2006, 06:31 PM)
Are you interested in only fiction? If not then I'd throw in Anton Levay and Aleister Crowley and the dude(s) who invented discordianism and the OTO. If you consider chaos magick lhp.
Hm ... no, I am not interested in fiction at all - except as a means of conveying occult knowledge.
I don't know about Crowley I am not sure if he was particularly lhp adn without belittling his historical contribution I think nowadays the best reason to study crowley is that it will prepare you for understanding grant.
My take on chaos magick - the stuff that is called by that name is just that it is golden dawn a little bit liberated from the worst dogma. It doesnt come close to morkocks take on it and certainly does not approach the chaos of seth or the typhonian tradition. This would also be my reason for not allowing lavey into the club.
n