Global Orgasm, December 22nd 2006 Options

http://www.globalorgasm.org/demo.html

The mission of the Global Orgasm is to effect change in the energy field of the Earth through input of the largest possible surge of human energy. Now that there are two more US fleets heading for the Persian Gulf with anti- submarine equipment that can only be for use against Iran, the time to change Earth’s energy is NOW! Read more about the fleet buildup here.

The intent is that the participants concentrate any thoughts during and after orgasm on peace. The combination of high- energy orgasmic energy combined with mindful intention may have a much greater effect than previous mass meditations and prayers.

The goal is to add so much concentrated and high-energy positive input into the energy field of the Earth that it will reduce the current dangerous levels of aggression and violence throughout the world.

Global Orgasm is an experiment open to everyone in the world.

We hope the results will register on the worldwide monitor system of the Global Consciousness Project.

This is the First Annual Solstice Synchronized Global Orgasm for Peace, leading up to the December Solstice of 2012, when the Mayan Calendar ends with a new beginning.

The Global Consciousness Project (http://noosphere.princeton.edu) has always fascinated me it will be interesting to see the results of this.

I think its a great idea. The only possible negative long term reaction I can see, is that if we induce a large positive 'swing' in the global consciousness, when it starts to 'swing' back, the momentum might carry it further into the negative. We might have a sudden world peace for a year, followed by an apocalyptic world war.

Which is exactly my point and why I made the vitamine analogy. Its sorta like mixing acids and bases. A chemists has to keep the ph levels balanced or else they end up with an explosive chain reation. And always pore acid into water! (I remembered that through the nmemonic A&W, fast a food joint). I think to maintain balance we focus our positive energy on the places with these dark spots (like the mid-east) while focusing negative energy on places that are needlessly bright (and prefferably in some place with few people). This way the Earth's energy field, in theory, remains stable enough that no serious back lash occurs.

Which is exactly my point and why I made the vitamine analogy. Its sorta like mixing acids and bases. A chemists has to keep the ph levels balanced or else they end up with an explosive chain reation. And always pore acid into water! (I remembered that through the nmemonic A&W, fast a food joint). I think to maintain balance we focus our positive energy on the places with these dark spots (like the mid-east) while focusing negative energy on places that are needlessly bright (and prefferably in some place with few people). This way the Earth's energy field, in theory, remains stable enough that no serious back lash occurs.

Well, that is under the assumption that the global energy field works that way. On the microscale, in the individual human energy field, such is not always the case. Large shifts in one's energy towards the positive spectrum can have negative results, based on other surrounding factors. If you become a beacon of light in a dark place, then yes, you will probably experience negative events in reaction. However, this is not the case %100 percent of the time - there have been exceptions to that in the years of observation I have cataloged. The fact of the matter is, the metaphysics of how the energy field will function and react are only partially predictable through reasoning with the limited understanding of energy physics that we have - some rules seems to apply, but others don't, and sometimes rules only apply sometimes and not all of the time. Plus, there are an infinite number of exceptions, and any number of unknown variables ranging from the energy produced by cultural consciousness, to the actual energetic part of the Earth itself, to even the energetic variables affecting us from the cosmos. There's just no telling until we see it first hand.

Which is exactly why I considered both sides of that argument - maybe there will be a negative reaction, based on this reasoning, but maybe there won't, based on another line of reasoning. Speculation can only prepare you to observe and theorize - it doesn't count as actual theory, and there's no reason there can't be empirical observation on this matter.

As Distillate suggested, though, given that there are so many billions of people involved in the energy field of the earth, I doubt that a few hundred thousand, perhaps a million or so, people will make such a massive change to the global energy system that backlash is even within the realm of possibility. We're a small planet compared to some of the other giants in our system, but the individual constitutes only a minor, nearly insignificant fragment of a comparably gargantuan energy.

I'm reminded that once upon a time, a rather talented but confusing magician lead me to draw a connection between the phi ratio and transmutation of energy systems from the negative spectrum to the postive. Perhaps done bit by bit over the course of many years - like you mentioned with acid and alkaline substances - the change remains stable and can grow in a meaningful but balanced way. I don't think we could manage to do it any faster than that anyway.

Hm...

Anyone want to try and sync up those eggs sometime this week? I got it yellow this time again, but really think that if more than one or even a few people gave it a try, it'd turn all the way red.

peace