Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 The Gates Of The Necronomicom, What did you think of this book?
gmcbroom
post Dec 2 2006, 06:22 PM
Post #1


Zelator
Group Icon
Posts: 190
Age: N/A
Gender: Male
Reputation: 3 pts




Hello All,
I've recently read the newest book book by Simon. I suppose its a good source of information when it talks about Gate walking; even providing Daoist views of that. Its gives a quick crash course in Ancient civilizations and a unique view of the Big Dipper in reference to the Necronomicom. It gives dates and times perfect for Gate Walking so those interested in such will have a good resource.
Now for all the praise I just gave the book here comes the pain. I didn't like it. The reason I didn't like it is because It didn't give me what I was hoping for. I'm a ceremonial magician and I do rever and respect the Elder Gods, But I'm not a priest by any means. So when I picked up this volume, I had hoped that this text would be somewhat like a grimoire and its not. So thats what I think of the Book. What do you think?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Nosotro Tehuti
post Dec 18 2006, 08:17 PM
Post #2


Zelator
Group Icon
Posts: 148
Age: N/A
Gender: Male
From: Wilkes Barre PA
Reputation: 14 pts




I think u may be missing the point of what simon is saying Distillate. What is saying is that neither the Ancient ones nor the Elder Gods want us destroyed. Just for the simple fact that neither care if we exist. But what he is saying is that the Elder Gods won't destroy us simply because they can, the Ancients will.
Ashnook, Endupanna, Myself, Suxur-Mash, and others, full-blooded priests of the Elder Gods, understand that these gods don't love us. But even so, they will impart to us knowledge that will allow us to fight the Ancients and hopefully preserve this universe we know and love.
I can see why though, that you would miss that aspect of Simon's writing in Gates. He wrote the other books much more for the general practitioner. But Gates was really a Priest's Book. It isn't, in all honesty, a book that is accessible to outsiders. I don't mean any insult by saying that, but you aren't a blooded, devoted priest of this path, so you can't feel the energies that we do and that give us an 'insiders' view of Gates.
Simon isn't flip-flopping between viewpoints, he's just fully explaining all aspects of the views our people accept.
Peace. .


--------------------


ILAT ENKI, IMHAS INA LIBBU INE SU'ATI AMELNAKRU MANNU EMU SHU GUSHTUKUL ELI INA DINGIR!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

distillate
post Dec 18 2006, 09:21 PM
Post #3


My bag of tricks will always make you happy :)
Group Icon
Posts: 206
Age: N/A
Gender: Male
Reputation: 4 pts




QUOTE(Seraphim @ Dec 18 2006, 09:17 PM) *
I think u may be missing the point of what simon is saying Distillate. What is saying is that neither the Ancient ones nor the Elder Gods want us destroyed. Just for the simple fact that neither care if we exist. But what he is saying is that the Elder Gods won't destroy us simply because they can, the Ancients will.
Ashnook, Endupanna, Myself, Suxur-Mash, and others, full-blooded priests of the Elder Gods, understand that these gods don't love us. But even so, they will impart to us knowledge that will allow us to fight the Ancients and hopefully preserve this universe we know and love.
I can see why though, that you would miss that aspect of Simon's writing in Gates. He wrote the other books much more for the general practitioner. But Gates was really a Priest's Book. It isn't, in all honesty, a book that is accessible to outsiders. I don't mean any insult by saying that, but you aren't a blooded, devoted priest of this path, so you can't feel the energies that we do and that give us an 'insiders' view of Gates.
Simon isn't flip-flopping between viewpoints, he's just fully explaining all aspects of the views our people accept.
Peace. .



IF simon was "blooded" I doubt he would say this on pg 189 of dead names.


QUOTE
Thus, one is forced to wonder what kind of benign place the Absu must be if its king must be tricked into giving up the laws of civilization and then finds it proper to send sea monsters after the goddess to get them back. The vision of ancient Sumerians concerning the Absu was not of peaceful, benign, and benevolent place from which all good things come, but a kingdom ruled by a despot and populated by sea monsters, among other creatures. Ask Inanna, who, on her flight from the Absu, must ask her vizier, Ninshubur, again and again for help as Enki attacks her boat repeatedly with his sea monsters until she finally returns safely home with the stolen goods



So he is going to bad mouth Enki for what? To prove a point in the chapter? I wouldn't be surprised if Mr. Simon never practiced a ritual out of the necronomicon or sumerian tablet. Any idiot who has practiced this paradigm knows Enki is the kindest God and one which the magic of the system depends on.

This post has been edited by distillate: Dec 18 2006, 09:25 PM


--------------------
"We have wandered into a state of prolonged neurosis because of the absence of a direct pipeline to the unconscious and we have then fallen victim to priestcraft of every conceivable sort. "

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post


Posts in this topic
gmcbroom   The Gates Of The Necronomicom   Dec 2 2006, 06:22 PM
distillate   Please refrain from using one liners if possible. ...   Dec 4 2006, 07:59 PM
nyechna   I have to say I was also a little disappointed wit...   Dec 6 2006, 11:15 AM
gmcbroom   I agree. I also feel that while Simon did a great...   Dec 6 2006, 12:33 PM
distillate   acid09 I was writing a review and I was almost fin...   Dec 8 2006, 05:51 PM
smasher666   Greetings, I certainly am interested in re...   Dec 8 2006, 10:46 PM
distillate   we call those OTO traps.   Dec 9 2006, 12:27 AM
Acid09   You could always copy and paste. Generally speak...   Dec 9 2006, 11:24 AM
distillate   You could always copy and paste. Generally speaki...   Dec 9 2006, 03:21 PM
nyechna   I agree Edunpanna that there binds in there to dis...   Dec 10 2006, 09:07 AM
Edunpanna   I agree Edunpanna that there binds in there to dis...   Dec 10 2006, 11:30 AM
Ashnook   So far I am about 1/4 of the way through the book....   Dec 11 2006, 01:09 AM
distillate   Some things I dislike about the book and would lik...   Dec 14 2006, 05:20 PM
Ashnook   Okay so he is saying the initiates that walk the g...   Dec 17 2006, 01:34 AM
necprince   Would be nice if simon or someone would respond to...   Dec 16 2006, 05:23 AM
Seraphim   Greetings, I agree with Ashnook on this. Si...   Dec 17 2006, 10:20 AM
distillate   I don't see anywhere (in gates) where he think...   Dec 18 2006, 02:33 PM
Wickedone   I don't see anywhere (in gates) where he think...   Dec 18 2006, 04:22 PM
distillate   I agree. He tells us not to trust either side, bu...   Dec 18 2006, 04:25 PM
Ashnook   Not saying I disliked the book, indeed it appeals ...   Dec 18 2006, 05:56 PM
distillate   He also says on pg 169 The whole chapter reads ...   Dec 18 2006, 06:17 PM
distillate   damnit where are you boys at? I want the truth *sl...   Dec 21 2006, 04:34 PM
Hagetaka Kuro   Hi everyone, So, would you say that this book isn...   Dec 22 2006, 12:53 AM
distillate   Hi everyone, So, would you say that this book isn...   Dec 22 2006, 01:40 AM
Ashnook   Hi everyone, So, would you say that this book isn...   Dec 22 2006, 11:24 AM
distillate   WE ARE 189!   Jan 7 2007, 08:59 PM

Closed
Topic Notes
Reply to this topicStart new topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd November 2024 - 06:30 PM