Hi
I am back
Sorry for the long absence I was having an annoying problem with my broadband.
It seems this topic has really taken off.
Here are my views on some of the statements.
QUOTE
I haven't experienced anything near as vivid as what Cosmicbrat describes though. Perhaps that's a good thing.
That is the beauty of sorcery each practitioner only takes it as far as they want to, most of us though strive to take it one step further. Always pushing on to see what is over the next horizon. That is how we learn not only about what we are attempting but also about ourselves.
QUOTE
When you got to the part about Twilight and Glamour, this is where I sneeze, "Rip-Off"!
That Twilight stuff is crap, do AP if you're into that sort of thing.
Twilight goes much further than AP, granted it is based on the same principal but what makes it different is the ability to afflict change.
QUOTE
Glamour is illusionary magick meant to disguise one's self and influence the minds of others. When you do an invisiblity spell, you're doing Glamour, Love Spells directed at a particular person are Glamour spells (as opposed to Love Spell directed towards a general desire, which is probably Enchantment).
By Glamour I do not mean Glamour Spells (sorry if I did not portray my meaning) True Glamour is achieved without the aid of spells. It is the ability to let others see you in “a different light” so to speak.
I do not do any preparation when I want to use glamour. I simply believe that I am what I want to be and that is the way I am perceived.
QUOTE
What pinches my nerves the most is that they ridicule Chaos Magick, when infact what they're doing is Chaos Magick!
I have Never ridiculed any form of magic – in fact I use many kinds including CHAOS MAGICK to achieve my goals. The only difference is that I do not believe in the boundaries of different castes.
QUOTE
I believe true Sorcerers just understand how things work, and seem to be able to manipulate reality (or reality hack) at will.
I do agree that what I do comes naturally but on the other hand if you wish to master something you need to do research on it. I might naturally be able to tap energy but if I do not learn how to control it I could cause myself serious damage.
QUOTE
So, magick is the study and application of various esoteric practices/rituals etc, while sorcery is a more innate ability?
Would sorcerors use ritual/foci/tools etc?
I do use tools on the occasion but I do not need to. What I do manifests from myself therefore I am the tool.
QUOTE
Ultimately, I would say what makes a Sorcerer is magical adaptibility, the ability to use magic on the spot is a characteristic of Sorcery. It's like being the MacGyver of Magic(k).
Now this I agree with (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/wizard.gif)