QUOTE(Faustopheles @ Dec 28 2006, 10:23 PM)
Also you might want to look up the definition of the word "geocentric" in the dictionary as it has nothing to do with what you are arguing. Compare to "heliocentric".
From your tone there alone I can derive three things:
1. You know that I know exactly what geocentric and heliocentric means - along with everything else mentioned throughout this thread.
2. You have a problem with my knowing of these topics.
Ergo, 3. You want to avoid ever having to learn such basics as are covered in this topic and others - so you spend your time here manufacturing lies to disguise exactly what scripted 4D emotional drama you are playing out here with me as part of it.
From this geocentric perspective I can see that changes in what we call seasons can be correlated to how the sun is moving through the sky.
QUOTE(Faustopheles @ Dec 28 2006, 10:23 PM)
Read those books I posted for you, the confusion will be cleared up.
This is where the condescending tone throughout your posts reaches it's height! I've read skywatchers but not the other two. What I know of astrology stems from the barbara clow books - which reminds me; when I popped up into chelmsford not long ago I meet a group of professional astrologers who in all seriousness could only look at the charts and say "that's interesting". Even when asked about the nature of a trine they couldn't really say anything - and some folks must pay these people for their interpretations!
I asked them about how astrology actually works and one person, I've since forgotten his name, waffled on about the energetic state of the solar system and how planets focus energy from the zodiacal stars, without an actual unifying concept behind it all - when it was patent to me that the planets are essentially vortexes in the aether, just like the chakra model.
7 ancestral planets
7 wheels
7 metals
7 days
etc.
Which can be overlaid on the babalon yantra or the seed of life pattern.
If you look into stan tenen's or dan winter's work you'll see the 7 turn labyrinth spells out the first few letters in genesis, which contains the rest of the torah/bible (just as the phi spiral contains itself, as it's a recursive form - the same way you can grow a tree from a seed or leaf, which contains in itself the same branching pattern. The correspondences go on and on... just like the phi spiral!).
QUOTE(Faustopheles @ Dec 28 2006, 10:23 PM)
My point is that for an observer on earth the sun moves along the horizon in two directions (Left to Right and Right to Left) these direction switch at each solstice so either direction can be called sunwise if measured relative to the horizon. THE POSITIONS OF SUNSETS/RISES DO NOT MOVE IN A CLOCKWISE MANNER, you could just as easily say they move counter-clockwise (...) you could argue that the sun moves counter-clockwise when looking at the north pole (in the northern hemisphere), and thus the proper motion is counter-clockwise, or you can say that the shadow of a gnomon moves clockwise (as a result of the counter-clockwise solar motion) and therefore the proper motion is clockwise. The explanation is culturally relevant (as to what you find more important) and thus does not hold any real weight.
You're wrong, still. The terms sunwise and widdershins are based on the movement of the sun throughout the year. You won't find any argument that sunwise (whether that's clockwise or anti-clockwise to us, depending on where you are in the universe and your planet's movement/axial tilt in relation to your sun) is the more 'important' for reasons I've already detailed (temperature, exposure to more sunlight, etc - which effects all life on this planet).
From summer to winter, sunwise: the birth and progression of life. The white sun.
From winter to summer, widdershins: the death and rebirth of life. The black sun.
Which has been used for thousands of years in one guise or another and this
is the reason we move about the circle clockwise during the LBRP. As I've already said, there's no way to make it any clearer.
This post has been edited by Zugzwang: Dec 29 2006, 10:58 AM