I don't think I could call one better then the other . . . in all cases. Each of these have been developed to speak in cooperation with different parts of the psyche and the collective spiritual spectrum.
One is more analytic leading to intuitive abstraction. The other is more intuitive, encouraging refinement and an analytic distillation.
I could only guess that the one's that best is the one that you get the most accurate or informative responses from.
Its like asking which is best, cosidering undesirable aspects of your psyche as destructively repressed experiences or as "bad" spirits. If you can answer that, and that answer is applicable for anyone else, you may already be the winner of a Noble Peace Prize.
Sorry, no help here.
This post has been edited by palindroem: Feb 6 2007, 04:49 PM
--------------------
"My theory is longer, thicker and harder then yours" - Frank Farrelly (regarding scientific objectivity)
|