Pazuzu Sigil Options

Have you ever placed the Pazuzu sigil over the picture on the image of the Pazuzu statue?

Try and you will see that the sigil is based on its shape and marks out its head, wings, arm, legs and feet. I would say this sigil is a sigilic drawing of the Pazuzu statue. The Humwawa sigil is also based on the traditional face of Humbaba.

Interesting.



(IMG:http://ancestors.blox.pl/resource/pazuzu1.jpg) (IMG:http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jasen01/texts/pazuzu.gif)





(IMG:http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jasen01/texts/humwawa.gif) (IMG:http://www.cs.utk.edu/~mclennan/BA/HL/images/Humbaba-face.gif)

This post has been edited by scorpionis: May 17 2007, 05:44 PM

Hello,

You have totally misunderstood me!

I agree with almost everything you have wrote!

What I presented was what I meant the necronomicon pointed out. I DO NOT believe that Ereshkigal is Tiamat! That was my whole point.

My problem with the necronomicon was that I understood the text as pointing out Ereshkigal as Tiamat. And that was what I had problem with.

I do NOT see Pazuzu, the underworld gods and Ereshkigal as the Ancient Ones. According to my understanding the Necronomicon, in those parts of the text I pointed out, placed the Underworld gods and Pazuzu on the same side as the gods of Chaos. And it was this that I criticized.

So you misunderstood my post.

Do you understand how I mean now?

Please read all my posts in this thread and my stance should become clear.