I did not say that I found your post arrogant, I was speaking in generalities but if the shoe fits and so on (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/blush2.gif) , nor did I see any one being dumped on in this thread, quite the contrary, I saw various view points all with relevence and all equally acceptable.
Your post implied a contempt for some view points, used a descriptive term of certain types of path workers as being below consideration, [I do not regard myself as one of them by the way] and went on to encourage the original querient to believe that his authenticity was the correct perspective, when it would have been perhaps more appropriate to say you held a view point more in keeping with theirs.
Re `Mabinogian' A collection of Welsh tales that appears to draws on Celtic ancestry.
Believed to have been written over a period of time between 1060 and 1250, and translated in the 19th century by Lady Charlotte Guest (1812-1895).
It was she who called them Mabinogian, the plural of Mabinogi meaning 'a story for the children'. The manuscripts she translated are held in Jesus College, Oxford, and are contained in the Red Book of Hergest dated back to 1325. By which time Christianity had certainly taken hold, and most if not all of the Celtic writings available to us are the result of stories re-written by the Monks of the early church.
From where do I obtain my references in regard to Dragons, well from a source
equally suspect no doubt in some eyes, my own contact with them, but then
ancient does not nessasarily imply authenticity.