Light has motion (recorded at about 983,571,056 feet-per-second) and for the brief 100ths of a second, the matter of the film would be affected by a collision with the light. If a photograph was taken in a perfect balance of past and future, you'd have unexposed film.
Of course, if you had some sort of device that didn't require light to take a picture, it might be different, but there'd still have to be some sort of medium that involved some motion.
QUOTE
"...each observer has his own set of 'nows,' and none of these various systems of layers can claim the prerogative of representing the objective lapse of time." - Kurt Gödel
I think time doesn't exist outside of a concept.
Even when astral traveling to the "past" you could just be visiting your own concept applied to the world. Or maybe a world created from memory.