I mainly think of the fact that all Religions are by their own nature Syncretic themselves. At some point in history every Religion was inspired by surrounding Religions and incorporated certain features.
Nobody seems averse to historical Syncretisms like Greco / Egypyptian, Romano / Celtic, Germano /Gaelic and so on. Other Religions are deliberately Syncretized, Thelema and Brazilian Umbanda being examples.
Heck, the whole Golden Dawn system is one big Syncretism after all, adding Kabbala to Hermetics to Tarot and so on.
Yet suddely it seemsīs expected to come to a full halt.
Personally i feel the term "Cultural theft" indicates ownership. And what about me? If i founded a new Religion incorporating Odin and the Runes, iīm allready "Norse" as far as ancestry go (in my case Scandinavian)? So who would i have stolen it from?
I do not necessarily think one should call things by "taken" names though. One does not practice Hellenismos or Asatru simply because some parts of Greek or Norse culture are incorporated.
|