So Many Books,so Much To Know Options

whew...I'm a point where there are so many books i want to read and so little time.Each time i read a new book on the occult or spirituality it leads me to another book or branch of knowledge i need to learn.I wish i could just put my head onto a book and miraculously absorb it by osmosis or something...you know? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)

I love books so much.

But have you ever gotten the sense that the books at the local book store -or even the local occult book store- regurgitate the same information? Red lion and the 5 elements and yada yada...

The other problem is arbitrary complexity. The Don Juan series could be considered a prime example of new age books that suggest that there is some mysterious order of the universe that you never quite get due to random variations and pervasive vagueness. I think these kinds of books tend to be written by authors that have an inkling about the sense of mystery in the universe but no real spiritual experience, thus creating books that leave the reader abound in wonder but without any sense of what it's about.

Then there are the authors that create their own set of terms to describe, sometimes badly, what other people have already described. What is stated well or poorly is always going to be a matter of opinion, but it's basically the regurgitation problem again.

So, to end my rambling, I think my point (if I have one) is that it IS possible to get a sense of what's out there. Obviously you can't read everything, but you can figure out what makes sense to you.

Oh! Random free association moment: occult dictionaries are a great way of getting familiar with most of the -mainstream occult- (what the hell is that?) materials.

So my other rambling point (if I had that) is to go wide!

I love books so much.

But have you ever gotten the sense that the books at the local book store -or even the local occult book store- regurgitate the same information? Red lion and the 5 elements and yada yada...

Yah I know what you mean. Sometimes the New Age authors seem to copy off of each other or use another person's writings as an authority. Also a lot of the New Age ideas that are portrayed as being from time immemorial actually originated in the 1960s with the hippies or the 1920s and the New Thought movement. Louise Hay or Hayes, for instance, seems to mix up her new ideas with ancient practices, often without knowing much about the ancient practices. Some of the authors are writers first and experts on what they are writing about second if at all.

The there is Mantak Chia. He lifts whole chapters from earlier books and puts them into the following books. He doesn't paraphrase it or restates it from a different angle he just lifts out chapters in their entirety from his earlier works. It isn't plagiarism, but it seems that when you've read three of his books you've pretty much read them all. I suppose that it saves him time and effort, but it seems like he is padding out his books with old material.