QUOTE(VitalWinds @ Nov 26 2011, 12:40 AM)
Anybody else here getting tired of the people who always want to say that you're wrong?
The "above average" student who tries to use science to debate whatever they can.
The religious zealot who uses arguments such as "Well, you're going to hell. That's just the harsh reality of it."
Or maybe just the goddamn skeptics who like to deny the existence of anything above them simply because they can never get enough proof.
Makes me freaking irate.
We should all do something about these people. Any suggestions? Maybe organized genocide? Mass marginalization and eradication? War? LOL. (It's funny cause those are all basically the same thing.) (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/rofl.gif)
But no really. Something ought to be done about people like this. Maybe we could start a movement to pass a bill making it illegal to deny another person's beliefs, so that a person has to state that it is only their opinion. I mean really it should all be categorized as hate speech anyway. If I started saying in a public building that all Mexicans were shit, I would get arrested. Yet Christians can stand around in their Churches and belittle the beliefs of others, simply because the people who founded this country were Christian. ...They were also white. And isn't it more wrong to verbally assault someone for their beliefs than for their heritage? It's "Oh, Buddha was a fatty and you're going to hell" as compared to "I dislike you because your people have social standards that most of the rest of the world would imprison a person for."
Am I making sense to you guys? I'm saying that it's one thing to assault a person's heritage, but quite another to assault their beliefs. Yes, it is all marginalization, but one has some degree of rationale behind it (unless you're a hateful inbred).
And I was soooo not serious about starting a holocaust. I'm just making a point in the best way that I can at the moment, and would ask that the moderators not freak out over it. (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Vagrant, I would appreciate your normal in-depth critique.
(IMG:
style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) Do I get summoned up by name now?
Eh, I've dealt with these people all my life. When I was younger I would get angry and argue with them... now I just smile and nod, and say pleasantly,
"Is that so?" as though fascinated. This approach tends to drive them all off. By refusing to acknowledge or engage in the conflict, I win by default. (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/yes2.gif)
Interesting thing to know, apparently - and now, I read this on Cracked.com but they did have sources - when it comes to argument and debate, our brains are not actually wired to be right, or to accept a 'more right' approach, even based on facts and evidence! Our brains are wired to win, because debate is a conflict in which, to the brain, the victor proves their dominance. Compound that with the righteous zeal of the true believer, and wars are fought over who gets to be 'right'. It takes quite a bit of rewiring to be the kind of person who can look at the evidence in any debate and actually accept their perspective is flawed on that basis and adjust their views accordingly.
So what to do about them? Nothing, and nothing really can be done - they'll always exist, and in a way it's because of the type of attitude that we progress. If no one ever said "No, you're wrong" then whatever is accepted to be right will just stay that way forever.
Cogs in the machine, all of them are ultimately necessary remember, or the cosmic clock breaks down and God cannot tell what time it is supposed to be.
peace