QUOTE
Interesting. I think this definition is a little more amenable to my tastes. I know that hypnotism was once thought to be bunk, but now is an established scientific practice, and, while hypnotized, people could be told that there are entities around which don't exist, that they would 'see' and react to. It seems similar. That being said, do you 'see' your entities, or do you hear them, feel them, or any combination thereof?
Similar - and definitely different.
The entities I evoke do indeed exist.
After all, they are integral aspects comprising the ecology (and functional in the economy) of my innerspace.
Evocation is the ritual tool I use for "taking them offline" and formally assessing and adjusting the efficiency of their function.
Invocation is the ritual tool I use for "bringing them online" to operate with upgraded dynamics.
So it's not the same as any sort of mere hypnotically induced daydream involving events or things which have no effectiveness or purpose other than entertainment.
Since the ritual process is akin to a consciously induced, tightly controlled, and impactfully focussed lucid dream, I "see" them, and "hear" them, and with some there is an associated scent to "smell" them. But make no mistake when I say that, I'm talking about using inner sight, inner audio, and inner smelling - I'm not talking about seeing, hearing, and smelling them using the physical sense organs of my body.
As I mentioned before: for me, evocation is not about causing metaphysical entities to become physical, such that other people would see, hear, touch, smell, etc... them with their physical senses.
This post has been edited by Praxis: Dec 5 2011, 08:05 AM