Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Thaumaturgy and Theurgy, Why aren't these terms used?
DocHolliday
post Jul 10 2005, 02:58 PM
Post #1


Neophyte
Group Icon
Posts: 72
Age: N/A
Reputation: none




With all the bickering over terms (magic vs magick, high magic vs low magic, etc) why can't people simply use thaumaturgy and theurgy? Miracle-working and god-working. I mean really, how hard can it be?

//end pointless rant


--------------------
www.livejournal.com/users/tenebrozo

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
DocHolliday
post Jul 10 2005, 05:23 PM
Post #2


Neophyte
Group Icon
Posts: 72
Age: N/A
Reputation: none




QUOTE(A_Smoking_Fox @ Jul 10 2005, 05:48 PM)
I think regardie uses the term theurgy in his books, when he means high magick.
But i think high magick can be a broader term than theurgy.

I'm aware of this. The excessive labelling and distinctions are what I'm starting to find tiresome (and I'm not even all that active in the "magical community," as it were).

Try to look at it from the standpoint of Kabbalistic nomenclature. One either works toward practical results (thus Kabbalah Ma'asith) or towards contemplative (or enlightenment-oriented) results (thus Kabbalah Iyunith). This is the basic line of demarcation between miracle-working (thaumaturgy) and god-working (theurgy).


--------------------
www.livejournal.com/users/tenebrozo

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Closed
Topic Notes
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

Similar Topics

Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No entries to display

2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th November 2024 - 10:32 AM