There is something rather sinister and unsavoury regarding this subject. The assumptions of incest traversing eons of time, or universes of being are incomprehensible.
Can one class as incest, a love affair with a man who was the longed for son or brother who was never born in a previous life?
And is
sexual RETICENCE in this life to be continually regarded as perversion, and the presumption of latent homosexuality or some other unconformity be endlessly mooted?
Could this discretion be justified as the remnant of a previous life's bitter experience with the seclusion left private as a fragment of memory?
Or unrequited love? What of that? Is that too to be turned against the saddened individual? Think of rape, and other perversions and the humiliating consequences.
My point is that love is a personal and very private emotion and too much is made publically of this desirable state of affairs.
I wonder why the question of sexuality should acquire a dubious tone? (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/fie.gif)