Care Frater,
No offence taken, my earlier post was dashed off rather quickly and would have benefited from further explanation. I've looked for evidence on which Crowley might have based his comment, but found nothing in the Golden Dawn papers, the Vision and the Voice or Liber Chanokh, but the correction I have referred to could have been Crowley's source. The angel IDOIGO can be found in the air tablet as you have noted but seems to have no connection with LIL which relates to (or contains) three parts of the earth found in the water tablet - Occodon, Pascomb & Valgars. So it's likely this arose from inspiration, or was a mistake by Crowley. The latter seems more likely in my opinion. The word IDOIGO, in common with the other descriptions of god in the Calls, seems to have no elemental affinity and I can see no reason why the word should be changed.
I once invoked the angel IDOIGO to examine whether there is a connection between his name and the word in the Call. He wasn't especially helpful but one of the Heptarchical angels who has proved quite helpful to me in filling in a few gaps indicates that the word expresses different concepts, much like the angel and archangel Michael - same name, separate entities.
LVX v.
|