Not In Kansas Anymore


I just read this book, and highly recommend it. It got me thinking about magic, the varied approaches, the lack of orthodoxy and the huge number of solitary practitioners. Some see this as a weakness, but now I see it as a unique strength. Without a single model or approach to magic, the individual is forced to personalize their practice. In addition, group think is very limited because people can and will go their own way when it begins to take hold. In other words, it is a good thing when groups disband (as most do after a period of time).


Thoughts? Input?