Psychicism And The Law Of Motion., How does it apply? Options

"For every action there is an equal and contrary reaction"

A law of science, of motion "founded" by Newton who was a practical alchemist, hardly anything new to that art perhaps but there you go, right time right place I suppose .lol.

Most people tend to stumble upon the occult world after realising themselves as being empathetic, receptive in regards to the very much active world around them. Feelings for the plight of humankind, woes about the earth and phenomena regarding psychic and other impacting events... its generally rare that a person starts out in the occult growing up with active, influencing abilities. In the book, "The occult" an unbiased and shallow look in on various phenomena by colin wilson he states that people with receptive faculties tend to be weak and frail as the world is very much unsympathetic and people clumsy in their respect toward others, generally true, an empath is not only stuck being bombarded by the currents of others but frail in regards to their own impact upon the world around them for fear of further currentual abuse.

Obvious where I'm going, I should get on with it. After a breakdown in relations between myself and a certain young lady I find myself stuck with her resonance, our link is/was genuine so as she goes about her business I find myself stuck with sights into and updates on what she's upto (damn it) but, understanding the law mentioned above, in being receptive shouldn't an empath also be able to "inherantly" influence their enviroment? The above is an example what led me to consider the point I'm trying to make, as a, "magician" I suppose I'm not short of protective techniques, so please, let's not start to advise and comfort me in my relationship issues you forever considerate empaths you *accepts hug* (IMG:style_emoticons/default/bigwink.gif)

To open it up... how does the principle, the law of motion work in regards to psychicism? Starting the investigation, what are the opposing faculties of certain aspects of the phenomena?

Personally not one to belive that God would endow an empath, with his/her woes and worries with the ability to be entroached and not entroach upon. Psychic attacks come in all shapes and guises it would be impossible to identify and accurately go about defending specifics so is there a key missing here? Shouldnt a psychic person innately be able to send thought themselves? A person who can identify objects at a distance be able to magnify close ones and view atoms and bacteria as a supposed opposing factor of the ability?

Another example, if someone studying with Bardon can produce sounds at will (without making them ordinarily, duh) is it a given that they can hear at a level of its opposing frequency it being influenced by the conjouring of sound from its depth? Or in general is the stirring quality of an active ability needed to induce or awaken the opposing factor, there being a lack of spark to awaken the same in a receptive quality such as empathy?

Urgh, let me go before I get lost and confuse myself .lol.

Peace
.M.

You covered a good bit there, Mchawi. What exactly do you consider covered by psychicism?


As far as seeing things at the molecular level, that's a concentration of consciousness, and is beyond the average person with that ability. Of course, this is all based off of the idea that seeing at a distance works on the same principle as hearing at a distance. I can focus my hearing far into the distance and pick up sounds that normally would go unheard by me. That doesn't mean I can necessarily pick out the smaller components of these sounds (meaning I can't amplify a single soundwave). But I suppose if I worked on it, I could. I'm probably not going to though, as I've been focusing more on pschokinesis. I suppose that fits into your opening statement a lot better doesn't it?

Anywho, I'm still half asleep. I'm gonna go get some coffee, but feel free to comment on the very probable irrelevance of my post. Not everything you posted seemed to fit together to me, but of course, I do that a lot myself. Just explain to me exactly what principles you are trying to exemplify or connect via whichever other.

Whats the reaction to your ability? Are there any ''side effects''? If you can hear things at a distance beyond a normal persons conprehension do you consider it a matter of range or frequency?

If every action has a reaction there has to then be an action to the reaction and so on and so on... but thats me going too far, tend to waffle and get lost in the proceedings like theres a kernel of truth someplace but by digging around for it all I've done is bury what was worth while. Probably best to ignore me at times .lol.

Hm. Reaction... I don't know. I mean there is a certain state of mind, but I don't think there is any specific reaction(that can be immediately identified, anyway). It's not really a matter of range or frequency but more a matter of location. I position myself(my spiritual body) at the location I'm listening to. I suppose it's more like the audio version of scrying, except it starts at the body and you move away towards the area you want to listen to.

And I believe you're really getting at something with the whole idea of everything having a reaction, including the reactions themselves. Although I see it more as everything has a reaction, and the reactions have the inverse of themselves, which has their own opposite reaction. This in my own personal opinion, reflects upon the physical and the spiritual and the various explanations of their own physics. Laws of Physics and Laws of Magick, in my opinion, correspond in more ways than can be logically fathomed by any living human being.