Well, Bamboo, I highly disagree with that opinion. Where did you get that info, and about which books? Have you even read The Tarot? (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/butcher.gif)
Perhaps this is true of a few books, because I did try to read his Samadhi, and I was surprised because I thought it was terrible. But The Tarot is in a class of its own. Besides, IMHO it bears the unmistakable mark of coming from years of experience and practical work which "unoriginal" works "edited" from "various sources" could not hope to ever accomplish.
Each chapter is a tarot card, and rather than going into interpretations of the symbolism (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/sleeping_.gif) , he reveals them as the occult tomes they are, in a way I have seen no other author accomplish, not even, dare I say it, Crowley, Matthers, Fortune, etc. But that's just my opinion. At the end of each chapter there is also some very useful practical work (nothing like Bardon, but still...)
He discusses things like the
physical exteriorization of the astral body, exorcising the astral body of larvae and parasites, the illusory feats of fakirs and how to disspel them, and he also claims that the clues to creating astral votexes are within the book, but clues that can be read only by initiated minds. As well, he discusses a few of his own experiences when he feels he needs to elaborate.
All in all, this book should NOT be dismissed. If you don't like it, that's your opinion, but read it first and come from an
informed point of view instead of just parroting things you've heard. (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/00000047.gif)