|
|
|
The Freemasons, Freemasonry--a Satanic Sect? |
|
|
Anderlin |
May 5 2006, 08:16 PM
|
Initiate
Posts: 3
Age: N/A Gender: Male
From: South Florida Reputation: none
|
Arcangle90, I'm with you 100% on this. I grew up around Masons as my granddad was an honorary 33rd Scottish Rite as well as an active member of the Amara Temple. So I naturally joined the local DeMolay chapter when I was old enough. I like and respected all the Chapter Dads (Masons) who were older at the time. And it still saddens me that most of them passed on before I was Raised. There's a lot of "new blood" in the lodge now, but those men where what really made me desirous to become a Mason. I only hope someday I can return everything they've given me... But I guess that's exactly why we're Masons. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) -Anderlin
|
|
|
|
Nill |
Sep 16 2006, 11:17 PM
|
Neophyte
Posts: 14
Age: N/A Gender: Male
Reputation: none
|
QUOTE(alin @ Sep 16 2006, 02:52 PM) Don't take the Bible and "God's words" so literally , it's a work of philosophy with amny points of view and on many occasions the church has used interpretation as a tool.Up until a few centuries ago anyone who said that the Earth was not the centre of the universe was burned alive , not to mention all the "witches" who were burned and tortured.
The Masons are not evil , but when you have their authority (I mean the most important members) I think people fear your power. And you could look at it from another perspective , before christianity was adopted as a general religion christians were wieved as we see satanists today.
Personally I would join the masons if I could.Anyway the ideea is to keep an open mind and to accept that the world is not black or white but many , many shades of grey. There is no black like the black and it is your black. There is no white like the white and it is your white. Maybe the sarcasm meter here is broken, cause it seems I'm getting no register here. If that paradigm works for you, then mahagique it up. I try to stay flexible with the most inflexible, and stating flexibility is the most inflexible at all. Follow? Hail Eris or don't Nill
|
|
|
|
Nill |
Sep 17 2006, 03:51 PM
|
Neophyte
Posts: 14
Age: N/A Gender: Male
Reputation: none
|
QUOTE(alin @ Sep 17 2006, 09:59 AM) To be honest I didn't understand that quote very well. I'll be honest your answer reaises many questions for me , I'm sorry but i can't fully grasp your response.Obviously I lack some knowledge however I did understand you keep an open mind which is great. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/confused012.gif) When I say rain, you think of rain you have experienced, or 'the rain', and that rain is your view of the rain. This means that because concepts conjure similar ideas, it does not mean that we are talking about the same thing. What if I were to ask you to picuture 'the mom'? Additionally, maintaining flexibility in thought or belief means that you are inflexible to the idea of holding an inflexible belief structure....like Christianity. Flexibility is the least flexible. When you ponder something, you realize that it is because of its qualities, additionally you know something by what it is not. A square is an equilatteral rectangle. Equilatteral means that no sides are bigger or smaller than others. Rectangle is the joining of four lines with 90* angles. You know a square because you know that it is not a trapezoid as its sides are equal, and you know a square because it is not a circle. Everything is it's own paradox at some level, things are because they are not. BTW...what path intrests you? Pandude
|
|
|
|
Nill |
Sep 17 2006, 07:45 PM
|
Neophyte
Posts: 14
Age: N/A Gender: Male
Reputation: none
|
Alin, you understand one of the basic truths of the universe quickly! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/clap.gif) Perhaps I can answer all such questions here if I state my non-sarcastic opinion: I believe that the only hoopla over the Masons are a bunch of Christians that have lost their stranglehold of free doctrines here in the Western societies. I believe that the distinction between satanistic and true servants of Christ matters only to those raising the objections. An animal flails when the mortal wound is cast. My apologies to any offended. Nill
|
|
|
|
alin |
Sep 18 2006, 09:10 AM
|
Neophyte
Posts: 63
Age: N/A Gender: Male
Reputation: none
|
Well thanks. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/blush2.gif) Anyway I think you are right in some measure. If I am not mistaken you consider the people opposing the masons are Christians who may have lost some of their freedom in western society.Strange I consider the Christians in Eastern society to be far more conservative and strict. Perhaps the ideea of the ones raising objections is strong.What do we define as satanists - if we reffer to the ones protesting twoards the hypocracy and lies of the church then I agree however if you reffer to the fools that break any law and resort to pointless violence just to feel strong then i do not agree. Be a bit more specific. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/mf_bookread.gif)
|
|
|
|
WisdomSeeker |
Oct 26 2006, 06:35 PM
|
Neophyte
Posts: 44
Age: N/A Gender: Male
Reputation: none
|
Why would someone thinks the free masons are satanic? I have never heard of evidence of this.
This only thing I can think of is: 1) A pentacle is common with the free masons. However the pentacle in their tradition derives from the pentagram which used to represent or be the seal of Jerusalem, and very common with the Hebrews (one version of the star of Solomon is a pentagram and it appears as such in the flags of Morocco and Ethiopia). Even before that it was a sumerian sign and its only lately in the last 1000 years were it has been associated as demonic sign.
2) Maybe they are referring to the association of the Knights Templar and the Free masons? some believe that the survivors of the Templar purges in France ended up in Scottland and their traditions were picked up by the freemasons. They were called heretics for worshipping a 'head' (probably the head of christ in the Linz of Turin, the only thing visible when folded up). Possibly they believed that Christ did not die in the cross but survived.. who know, they are many books about them.
In any event, my understanding is that to be a free mason you have to believe in and submit to a higher power than yourself, similar to the AA 12 steps. Therefore satanist (at least those from LaVey's church of Satan) would NOT be accepted into freemasonry, as they believe in the innate godness of each person and the lack of a superior being (they would say I am my own god and I submit to no one).
So I dont think free masonry has anything satanic about it. If anything, where their views diverged from the accepted church ortodoxy they were probably more on the right, as the Templar knights organization was founded in Jerusalem and had direct access to any existant record, scriptures, treasures or traditions in that part of the world.
Traveller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Topics
Similar Topics
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|