OK, here's the rest of it.
First of all, there is a footnote after "have been interchanged" from the OP...
QUOTE
* This does not mean that your weapons will not work if the above ascription is used: of course they will if they have been properly consecrated, but using them will be somewhat like trying to batter someone to death with a dagger or stab them with a staff. Hard work.
After that...
QUOTE
The weapons may be characterized as follows:
1. The Dagger (Fire) is a weapon made of iron or steel, forged under heat, sharp and incisive like flame. As it is a weapon, it is associated with Mars [my bad in OP] whose color is red, the color of fire. Additionally the Golden Dawn attribution of the Elemental Weapons to the Sephiroth incorporated the same blind, so that despite hitherto published ascriptions, the Dagger is in fact a Weapon of Tiphareth, symbolic of sacrifice and the death and resurrection themes associated with this Sphere.
2. The Wand (Air) like the Caduceus is part of the insignia of Mercury, the winged messenger of the gods. Mercury is traditionally associated with Air, and his patronage of travelers further confirms the attribution of the Staff or Wand to Air. The wand is the Weapon of Hod, Sephirah of Mercury and magic.
Some other thoughts:
DMK doesn't mention the consecration of said Weapons (at least up to Lesson 3 where I'm at). Isn't that essential? And here is what he says about the Tarot decks...
QUOTE
The "correct" version of the Tarot (their own version) was considered to be an important secret of the Golden Dawn. Waite, who had taken solemn vows not to reveal the inner secrets of the Golden Dawn, kept his word. Many of his cards are designed with incorrect symbolism (compared to the Golden Dawn version) in order to fool the uninitiated.
No citation or reference is given for this. It's hard to believe the Waite/Smith deck is not all correct.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not knocking Donald Michael Kraig. I have a lot of admiration for him and I'm enjoying his book tremendously. But I also have a lot of admiration for the Skinner/King book since it's what got me started on "the Path." And I plan on reading more Stephen Skinner books.
This post has been edited by horus: Aug 31 2009, 06:09 AM